Physical vs Transition Climate Risks: A Practical Framework for Corporate Disclosure

What Are Climate-Related Risks: Definition and Why They Matter for Corporate Disclosure
Climate risks can be defined as the risks associated with the risks borne by enterprises concerning climate change. Based on the TCFD report, there are two primary types of these risks. The first one is called the physical risk which refers to the risk brought about by changes in the environment due to climate change. The second is transition risk which refers to the risk arising from the transition into the low-carbon economy.
The disclosure of both physical and transition risks has become obligatory through legislation rather than voluntary in major economies. All three accounting standards, namely, IFRS S2 (effective from 2024), ESRS E1 within the EU CSRD, and BRSR in India, demand climate risk disclosure. Businesses having a worldwide presence, having investors, and exporting their products have no choice but to report their climate risks based on different scenarios.
Types of Climate Risk: Physical, Transition, and Liability
Risk Type | Definition | Primary Examples | Disclosure Urgency |
Physical Risk | Risks from climate-driven physical events and long-term environmental shifts | Floods, cyclones, heat stress, sea-level rise, drought | High: direct asset damage and supply chain disruption |
Transition Risk | Risks from the global shift to a low-carbon economy across policy, technology, market, and reputational dimensions | Carbon pricing, stranded assets, regulatory change, consumer shifts | High: earnings and valuation impact in carbon-intensive sectors |
Liability Risk | Risks from litigation, regulatory action, or enforcement for climate-related failures or inadequate disclosure | Shareholder suits, greenwashing enforcement, community compensation claims | Growing: rapidly expanding in EU, UK, Australia, and US |
What Is Physical Climate Risk: Acute vs Chronic Risks Explained
Physical climate risk arises from the physical impacts of a changing climate, assessed through the IPCC formula:
Risk = Hazard x Exposure x Vulnerability.
Acute physical climate risks are discrete, event-driven hazards with rapid onset:
Cyclones, hurricanes, and tropical storms
Riverine, coastal, and flash flooding
Wildfires and extreme heat events
Severe precipitation and hailstorms
Chronic physical climate risks are gradual, long-term shifts in climate systems:
Rising mean temperatures and persistent heat stress
Sea-level rise and coastal erosion
Shifting monsoon patterns and prolonged drought
Glacial melt and freshwater supply disruption
India suffers from exposure to both types of risks at the same time. The acute physical climatic risk has increased drastically with 4,419 deaths caused by climate changes in 2025, where extreme climatic conditions were experienced on 331 out of 334 days (Down to Earth, 2025). Furthermore, chronic risks have led to a predicted 160-200 million Indians dying due to heatwaves in 2030 (World Bank).
What Is Transition Climate Risk: Policy, Market, Technology, and Reputational Risks Explained
The transition climate risk comes about due to the systematic move toward a lower-carbon economy. The four subtypes of transition climate risks as per TCFD and IFRS S2 include the following:
Legal and policy-related: Legal and regulatory changes, including the CCTS emission intensity goals for nine industries set by India, SEBI BRSR Core mandatory requirements, as well as border adjustments concerning steel, cement, and aluminum imports under the EU CBAM.
Technology-based: Transition costs as a result of the movement toward lower-emission technology and asset stranding due to higher-carbon assets: power stations using coal, combustion engines, and carbon-heavy capital equipment.
Market: Changes in market supply, demand, and prices as a result of changes in consumer demands and investors’ preferences: reduced demand for carbon-heavy products, such as fossil fuels.
Reputational: Losses in brand and stakeholder trust due to inactivity regarding climate change or because of greenwashing accusations in sustainable disclosure.
Climate Transition Risk: Carbon pricing alone can affect up to 13% of companies’ earnings (Persefoni, referring to TCFD report), making it a financial factor related to Indian export industries and carbon-intensive producers.
Physical Risk vs Transition Risk: Key Differences at a Glance
Attribute | Physical Climate Risk | Transition Climate Risk |
Source | Physical climate and weather events | Policy, technology, market, and social shifts to a low-carbon economy |
Time horizon | Near-term to long-term; accelerating with each degree of warming | Near-to-medium-term; primarily policy-driven |
Measurability | Quantifiable via IPCC hazard models and SSP/RCP climate scenarios | Partly quantifiable via carbon pricing models and transition scenario analysis |
Company control | Limited: managed through physical adaptation and asset relocation | Moderate: manageable through decarbonisation and technology investment |
Sector exposure | Universal; highest for agriculture, real estate, infrastructure, power | Carbon-intensive: energy, steel, cement, aviation, banking |
Primary mitigation | Physical adaptation: flood defences, heat-resilient design, water management | Operational decarbonisation: GHG reduction, clean technology, CCTS compliance |
Real-World Examples of Physical and Transition Climate Risks Across Industries
Sector | Physical Climate Risk Example | Transition Climate Risk Example |
Agriculture | Crop yield loss from heat stress and erratic monsoons; 17.4M hectares damaged in 2025 (Down to Earth) | Carbon tax on synthetic fertilisers raising input costs |
Energy / Power | Flood damage to coal and power infrastructure; 19.5% average projected asset loss without adaptation (Oxford, 2025) | Stranded coal assets as renewables reach cost parity; CCTS GEI targets |
Steel / Cement | Water stress disrupting production at water-intensive industrial facilities | EU CBAM import tariff on exports; CCTS emission intensity targets |
Banking / NBFC | Mortgage default risk in flood-prone and heat-stressed coastal areas | Increased provisioning for carbon-intensive loan portfolios under RBI climate norms |
Real Estate | Sea-level rise and cyclone flooding devaluing coastal and low-lying assets | Retrofit costs for energy efficiency and building code compliance |
How to Identify, Assess, and Disclose Physical and Transition Risks: Step-by-Step Framework
Step 1:
Define scope and boundaries. Identification of the specific physical assets, operations, and value chain nodes that need to be assessed. Identification of the location of the physical assets based on the IPCC hazards dataset and the national disaster management database.
Step 2:
Identify relevant climate hazards. With respect to physical risk, assess both acute and chronic hazards for each asset according to IPCC scenario (SSP/RCP) data. In respect to transition risk, identify the relevant regulatory instruments: CCTS, EU CBAM, BRSR Core, and decarbonisation scenarios by sector.
Step 3:
Assess exposure and vulnerability. Utilize the following equation for the assessment: Risk = Hazard x Exposure x Vulnerability. Define asset-level exposure and the organization’s adaptive capacity.
Step 4:
Run climate scenario analysis. Stress-test strategy against a low-emissions pathway (1.5°C/2°C) and a higher-warming scenario (3-4°C) to identify divergent financial impacts across both physical risk and transition risk dimensions.
Step 5:
Quantify financial materiality. Conduct stress-testing against a scenario with low emissions (1.5°C/2°C) and a scenario of higher warming (3-4°C), highlighting divergences in financial implications between physical risk and transition risk dimensions.
Step 6:
Disclose under the applicable framework. Map the outcomes according to TCFD four pillar disclosure: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, Metrics and Targets, or IFRS S2 disclosure standards, or ESRS E1 dual materiality disclosure, depending on the jurisdiction.
Climate Risk Disclosure Frameworks: TCFD, IFRS S2, and ESRS E1
Framework | Issuing Body | Status | Physical Risk | Transition Risk | India Relevance |
TCFD (4 pillars) | FSB (now in IFRS S2) | Embedded in IFRS S2; backbone of global disclosure | Yes: acute and chronic | Yes: all 4 sub-categories | Basis of BRSR climate risk |
IFRS S2 | ISSB | Mandatory in adopted jurisdictions; in effect January 2024 | Yes: scenario-tested | Yes: scenario-tested | Adopted by UK, Australia, Singapore; relevant for Indian global listings |
ESRS E1 | EFRAG / EU | Mandatory for large EU-scope companies | Yes: double materiality | Yes: double materiality | Applies to Indian exporters and companies with EU operations |
Common Challenges Companies Face in Climate Risk Assessment
These are some common challenges constantly being encountered by firms in physical and transition risk assessments:
Lack of facility-level data: facility-level climate hazards geospatial data is typically not systematically obtained, except in extractives and infrastructure industries.
Complex scenario selection and interpretation: choosing and understanding IPCC scenarios (SSP1-1.9 up to SSP5-8.5) requires specific knowledge that firms typically lack.
Challenges in financialization: converting hazard risks to audit-proof financial indicators is difficult for the time being.
Absence of scope 3 coverage: physical risks in the value chain are commonly not considered due to data unavailability, leading to understatements in reporting.
Fragmented India data sources: India does not have one single national climate risk model including IMD, NIDM, and IIT data sets.
How Oren Helps Companies Assess and Disclose Climate Risks
Oren provides end-to-end climate risk assessment and disclosure advisory for companies navigating TCFD, IFRS S2, ESRS E1, and India's BRSR reporting obligations.
Oren's climate risk services cover: physical risk screening at asset and facility level using IPCC-aligned hazard models; transition risk identification mapped to India's regulatory environment (CCTS, BRSR Core, EU CBAM); climate scenario analysis across 1.5°C and 3-4°C pathways; financial materiality quantification; and full TCFD, IFRS S2, and ESRS E1 disclosure drafting.
For Indian listed companies subject to BRSR Core assurance and value chain disclosure requirements from FY 2025-26, Oren's structured physical risk and transition risk framework provides the data-backed documentation that third-party assessors and regulators require.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
Q1. What is climate risk?
Climate risk is the financial and strategic risk arising from climate change. It encompasses physical risk (climate events and environmental shifts), transition risk (the low-carbon economy shift), and liability risk (litigation for inadequate climate action or disclosure).
Q2. What is the difference between physical risk and transition risk?
Physical risk arises from climate-driven events and environmental shifts such as floods and heat stress. Transition risk arises from the policy, technology, and market shift to a low-carbon economy. Both require disclosure under IFRS S2 and TCFD-aligned frameworks.
Q3. What are the types of climate risk?
TCFD and IFRS S2 classify climate risks as physical (acute and chronic) and transition (policy, technology, market, reputational). Liability risk, covering climate litigation and greenwashing enforcement, is a third growing category.
Q4. What is acute physical climate risk?
Acute physical climate risk is sudden-onset hazard risk: cyclones, floods, wildfires, and extreme heat events. These cause direct asset damage and supply chain disruption, distinguished from chronic risks by their episodic rather than gradual onset.
Q5. What is chronic physical climate risk?
Chronic physical climate risk refers to gradual, long-term shifts: rising mean temperatures, sea-level rise, persistent drought, shifting rainfall patterns, and glacial melt affecting asset values and productivity over multi-decade timescales.
Q6. What is transition risk in climate change?
Transition risk in climate change is financial risk from the shift to a low-carbon economy. It includes policy risk (carbon taxes, CCTS targets), technology risk (stranded assets), market risk (demand shifts), and reputational risk (greenwashing exposure).
Q7. What is liability climate risk?
Liability climate risk is financial loss from litigation or regulatory enforcement: shareholder suits for inadequate climate disclosure, community compensation claims, and greenwashing enforcement actions against inaccurate sustainability disclosures.
Q8. How do companies assess physical and transition climate risks?
Companies identify hazards, apply the IPCC formula (Risk = Hazard x Exposure x Vulnerability), run scenario analysis across 1.5°C and higher-warming pathways, quantify financial materiality, and disclose under TCFD, IFRS S2, or ESRS E1.
Q9. What frameworks require disclosure of physical and transition risks?
TCFD (embedded in IFRS S2), IFRS S2 (effective January 2024), and ESRS E1 under CSRD all mandate disclosure of both physical and transition climate risks. India's BRSR framework incorporates TCFD-aligned climate risk principles for listed companies.
Q10. What are examples of transition risks in climate change?
Transition risk examples include carbon taxes, EU CBAM tariffs on steel and cement exports, CCTS emission intensity compliance costs for Indian manufacturers, stranded coal assets, and retrofit costs from tightening building energy efficiency regulations.
Q11. What are examples of physical climate risks?
Physical climate risk examples include flood damage to manufacturing plants, heat stress reducing crop yields and worker productivity, coastal asset devaluation from sea-level rise, and water stress disrupting industrial production during drought.
Q12. How is climate risk reported under TCFD and IFRS S2?
TCFD and IFRS S2 use four disclosure pillars: Governance, Strategy, Risk Management, and Metrics and Targets. IFRS S2 adds mandatory scenario analysis, Scope 3 emissions disclosure, and industry-specific metrics drawn from SASB Standards.
About the author
Olivia Paul
ESG & Sustainability Advisor
Olivia is an ESG & Sustainability Advisor at Oren, focused on ESG reporting and strategy, materiality assessments, GHG inventory, and net-zero roadmaps across manufacturing, financial services, and infrastructure.






